<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zune 8gb/16g vs. iPod Nano 4G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano</link>
	<description>Technology, News, Photography, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Designer Sunglasses Online</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Designer Sunglasses Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-387</guid>
		<description>•	Very exciting insight into your head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>•	Very exciting insight into your head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Murry</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>D Murry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-346</guid>
		<description>@Miley C. and CS Lewis: The major point as stated earlier was that the Zune first had the ability to watch video in landscape mode in that size and form factor.  The earlier iPod nano had a smaller square screen.  The original iPod was not the first mp3 player, but it was the first one that had user friendly controls and interface to a computer (Mac) that worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miley C. and CS Lewis: The major point as stated earlier was that the Zune first had the ability to watch video in landscape mode in that size and form factor.  The earlier iPod nano had a smaller square screen.  The original iPod was not the first mp3 player, but it was the first one that had user friendly controls and interface to a computer (Mac) that worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eight</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Eight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 03:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Wow the fact that you had to quote Miley C says it all, Apple never had anything that looked remotely like a zune until the first zune came out, then you can see the direct similarities. You should really research a topic before you argue about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the fact that you had to quote Miley C says it all, Apple never had anything that looked remotely like a zune until the first zune came out, then you can see the direct similarities. You should really research a topic before you argue about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS Lewis</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>CS Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Dont even say Apple copied Microsoft.  Apple&#039;s 4G nano is not some &quot;new ipod structure copied off microsoft.&quot; Apple had this from the start.  Look at their 1G and 2G models back from nearly 2 years before the &quot;zune nano&quot; was introduced.  Who&#039;s the copycat now?

And, well Microsoft said it themselves, they only started making zunes to directly compete with the iPod industry.  Like Miley C. said, Give up Zune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont even say Apple copied Microsoft.  Apple&#8217;s 4G nano is not some &#8220;new ipod structure copied off microsoft.&#8221; Apple had this from the start.  Look at their 1G and 2G models back from nearly 2 years before the &#8220;zune nano&#8221; was introduced.  Who&#8217;s the copycat now?</p>
<p>And, well Microsoft said it themselves, they only started making zunes to directly compete with the iPod industry.  Like Miley C. said, Give up Zune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miley C.</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Miley C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Give up Zune! ipod is way more popular. ipod is THE mp3 player. Zune is the one who copied ipod in the first place as being a good quality colourful player... and we all know ipod is cooler and thought of the idea first so... give up ZUNE! 
p.s I am not biased i do really think my thoughts over even though it may not seem like it

peace, love and headbands
miley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give up Zune! ipod is way more popular. ipod is THE mp3 player. Zune is the one who copied ipod in the first place as being a good quality colourful player&#8230; and we all know ipod is cooler and thought of the idea first so&#8230; give up ZUNE!<br />
p.s I am not biased i do really think my thoughts over even though it may not seem like it</p>
<p>peace, love and headbands<br />
miley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Murry</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>D Murry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I would agree.  The Sennheiser&#039;s are a much better pair of headphones.  The biggest difference with the bass would be due to the fact that they are Ear Canal Headphones (ECH). They seal off the outside environment while coupling with your eardrum better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree.  The Sennheiser&#8217;s are a much better pair of headphones.  The biggest difference with the bass would be due to the fact that they are Ear Canal Headphones (ECH). They seal off the outside environment while coupling with your eardrum better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodydetox</title>
		<link>http://dmurry.com/technology/zune-vs-ipod-nano/comment-page-1#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>bodydetox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmurry.com/?p=45#comment-305</guid>
		<description>iPod nano is very good as a walkaround mp3 player. my only complaint is that the included headphones lack good bass. I replaced it with the Sennheiser CX-300 and the sound was awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod nano is very good as a walkaround mp3 player. my only complaint is that the included headphones lack good bass. I replaced it with the Sennheiser CX-300 and the sound was awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

